Discussing the risk perception of MNCs into the Middle East
Discussing the risk perception of MNCs into the Middle East
Blog Article
Studies suggest that the prosperity of multinational corporations within the Middle East hinges not only on financial acumen, but also on understanding and integrating into regional cultures.
A lot of the present academic work on risk management strategies for multinational corporations demonstrates particular uncertainties but omits uncertainties that are tough to quantify. Indeed, lots of research in the international administration field has centered on the handling of either political risk or foreign exchange uncertainties. Finance and insurance coverage literature emphasises the risk factors which is why hedging or insurance instruments could be developed to mitigate or transfer a firm's danger exposure. Nonetheless, present studies have brought some fresh and interesting insights. They have sought to fill part of the research gaps by providing empirical information about the risk perception of Western multinational corporations and their management techniques on the firm level in the Middle East. In one research after collecting and analysing data from 49 major worldwide businesses that are have extensive operations in the GCC countries, the authors discovered the following. Firstly, the risk associated with foreign investments is actually much more multifaceted compared to usually cited factors of political risk and exchange rate exposure. Cultural danger is regarded as more important than political risk, economic danger, and economic risk. Secondly, despite the fact that elements of Arab culture are reported to have a strong influence on the business environment, most firms find it difficult to adapt to regional routines and customs.
Regardless of the political uncertainty and unfavourable economic climates in some areas of the Middle East, foreign direct investment (FDI) in the area and, particularly, within the Arabian Gulf has been gradually increasing within the last 20 years. The relevance of the Middle East and Gulf markets is growing for FDI, and the connected risk is apparently essential. Yet, research on the risk perception of multinationals in the area is lacking in amount and quality, as specialists and attorneys like Louise Flanagan in Ras Al Khaimah would probably attest. Although different empirical research reports have investigated the effect of risk on FDI, most analyses have been on political risk. Nevertheless, a brand new focus has appeared in present research, shining a limelight on an often-disregarded aspect particularly cultural facets. In these pioneering studies, the authors pointed out that companies and their management often seriously take too lightly the impact of cultural factors because of a lack of knowledge regarding cultural variables. In fact, some empirical studies have found that cultural differences lower the performance of multinational enterprises.
This cultural dimension of risk management demands a change in how MNCs operate. Adjusting to regional traditions is not only about being familiar with company etiquette; it also requires much deeper social integration, such as for instance appreciating local values, decision-making styles, and the societal norms that influence business practices and employee conduct. In GCC countries, successful company relationships are designed on trust and individual connections instead of just being transactional. Moreover, MNEs can take advantage of adapting their human resource management to mirror the social profiles of regional employees, as factors influencing employee motivation and job satisfaction vary widely across countries. This calls for a change in mindset and strategy from developing robust financial risk management tools to investing in cultural intelligence and local expertise as experts and attorneys such Salem Al Kait and Ammar Haykal in Ras Al Khaimah may likely suggest.
Report this page